1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
|
From 86529758570cef4c73fb9b9c4104fdc510f701ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 13:16:23 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix DoS vulnerability in libtirpc
Currently svc_run does not handle poll timeout and rendezvous_request
does not handle EMFILE error returned from accept(2 as it used to.
These two missing functionality were removed by commit b2c9430f46c4.
The effect of not handling poll timeout allows idle TCP conections
to remain ESTABLISHED indefinitely. When the number of connections
reaches the limit of the open file descriptors (ulimit -n) then
accept(2) fails with EMFILE. Since there is no handling of EMFILE
error this causes svc_run() to get in a tight loop calling accept(2).
This resulting in the RPC service of svc_run is being down, it's
no longer able to service any requests.
RPC service rpcbind, statd and mountd are effected by this
problem.
Fix by enhancing rendezvous_request to keep the number of
SVCXPRT conections to 4/5 of the size of the file descriptor
table. When this thresold is reached, it destroys the idle
TCP connections or destroys the least active connection if
no idle connnction was found.
Fixes: 44bf15b8 rpcbind: don't use obsolete svc_fdset interface of libtirpc
Signed-off-by: dai.ngo@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
---
INSTALL | 371 +----------------------------------------------------------
src/svc.c | 17 ++-
src/svc_vc.c | 62 +++++++++-
3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 372 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 => 120000 INSTALL
diff --git a/src/svc.c b/src/svc.c
index 6db164b..3a8709f 100644
--- a/src/svc.c
+++ b/src/svc.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
#define max(a, b) (a > b ? a : b)
-static SVCXPRT **__svc_xports;
+SVCXPRT **__svc_xports;
int __svc_maxrec;
/*
@@ -194,6 +194,21 @@ __xprt_do_unregister (xprt, dolock)
rwlock_unlock (&svc_fd_lock);
}
+int
+svc_open_fds()
+{
+ int ix;
+ int nfds = 0;
+
+ rwlock_rdlock (&svc_fd_lock);
+ for (ix = 0; ix < svc_max_pollfd; ++ix) {
+ if (svc_pollfd[ix].fd != -1)
+ nfds++;
+ }
+ rwlock_unlock (&svc_fd_lock);
+ return (nfds);
+}
+
/*
* Add a service program to the callout list.
* The dispatch routine will be called when a rpc request for this
diff --git a/src/svc_vc.c b/src/svc_vc.c
index f1d9f00..3dc8a75 100644
--- a/src/svc_vc.c
+++ b/src/svc_vc.c
@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@
extern rwlock_t svc_fd_lock;
+extern SVCXPRT **__svc_xports;
+extern int svc_open_fds();
static SVCXPRT *makefd_xprt(int, u_int, u_int);
static bool_t rendezvous_request(SVCXPRT *, struct rpc_msg *);
@@ -82,6 +84,7 @@ static void svc_vc_ops(SVCXPRT *);
static bool_t svc_vc_control(SVCXPRT *xprt, const u_int rq, void *in);
static bool_t svc_vc_rendezvous_control (SVCXPRT *xprt, const u_int rq,
void *in);
+static int __svc_destroy_idle(int timeout);
struct cf_rendezvous { /* kept in xprt->xp_p1 for rendezvouser */
u_int sendsize;
@@ -313,13 +316,14 @@ done:
return (xprt);
}
+
/*ARGSUSED*/
static bool_t
rendezvous_request(xprt, msg)
SVCXPRT *xprt;
struct rpc_msg *msg;
{
- int sock, flags;
+ int sock, flags, nfds, cnt;
struct cf_rendezvous *r;
struct cf_conn *cd;
struct sockaddr_storage addr;
@@ -379,6 +383,16 @@ again:
gettimeofday(&cd->last_recv_time, NULL);
+ nfds = svc_open_fds();
+ if (nfds >= (_rpc_dtablesize() / 5) * 4) {
+ /* destroy idle connections */
+ cnt = __svc_destroy_idle(15);
+ if (cnt == 0) {
+ /* destroy least active */
+ __svc_destroy_idle(0);
+ }
+ }
+
return (FALSE); /* there is never an rpc msg to be processed */
}
@@ -820,3 +834,49 @@ __svc_clean_idle(fd_set *fds, int timeout, bool_t cleanblock)
{
return FALSE;
}
+
+static int
+__svc_destroy_idle(int timeout)
+{
+ int i, ncleaned = 0;
+ SVCXPRT *xprt, *least_active;
+ struct timeval tv, tdiff, tmax;
+ struct cf_conn *cd;
+
+ gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
+ tmax.tv_sec = tmax.tv_usec = 0;
+ least_active = NULL;
+ rwlock_wrlock(&svc_fd_lock);
+
+ for (i = 0; i <= svc_max_pollfd; i++) {
+ if (svc_pollfd[i].fd == -1)
+ continue;
+ xprt = __svc_xports[i];
+ if (xprt == NULL || xprt->xp_ops == NULL ||
+ xprt->xp_ops->xp_recv != svc_vc_recv)
+ continue;
+ cd = (struct cf_conn *)xprt->xp_p1;
+ if (!cd->nonblock)
+ continue;
+ if (timeout == 0) {
+ timersub(&tv, &cd->last_recv_time, &tdiff);
+ if (timercmp(&tdiff, &tmax, >)) {
+ tmax = tdiff;
+ least_active = xprt;
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (tv.tv_sec - cd->last_recv_time.tv_sec > timeout) {
+ __xprt_unregister_unlocked(xprt);
+ __svc_vc_dodestroy(xprt);
+ ncleaned++;
+ }
+ }
+ if (timeout == 0 && least_active != NULL) {
+ __xprt_unregister_unlocked(least_active);
+ __svc_vc_dodestroy(least_active);
+ ncleaned++;
+ }
+ rwlock_unlock(&svc_fd_lock);
+ return (ncleaned);
+}
--
1.8.3.1
|
