From 52953ad1ef6850a93ec433cfcd38810433e11a8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: V3n3RiX Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:46:41 +0000 Subject: drop our grub, use gentoo one --- sys-boot/grub/files/grub-2.00-no-gets.patch | 22 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 sys-boot/grub/files/grub-2.00-no-gets.patch (limited to 'sys-boot/grub/files/grub-2.00-no-gets.patch') diff --git a/sys-boot/grub/files/grub-2.00-no-gets.patch b/sys-boot/grub/files/grub-2.00-no-gets.patch deleted file mode 100644 index c21d4b97..00000000 --- a/sys-boot/grub/files/grub-2.00-no-gets.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,22 +0,0 @@ -hack until gzip pulls a newer gnulib version - -From 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Eric Blake -Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:30:41 -0600 -Subject: [PATCH] stdio: don't assume gets any more - -Gnulib intentionally does not have a gets module, and now that C11 -and glibc have dropped it, we should be more proactive about warning -any user on a platform that still has a declaration of this dangerous -interface. - ---- a/grub-core/gnulib/stdio.in.h -+++ b/grub-core/gnulib/stdio.in.h -@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ - so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is - always declared, since it is required by C89. */ - #undef gets --_GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead"); - - #if @GNULIB_FOPEN@ - # if @REPLACE_FOPEN@ -- cgit v1.2.3