summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/media-libs/gstreamer/files
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorV3n3RiX <venerix@redcorelinux.org>2018-09-21 18:00:10 +0100
committerV3n3RiX <venerix@redcorelinux.org>2018-09-21 18:00:10 +0100
commit265dbe5dbc14c199299496c6db8fce3f76647015 (patch)
treeab18b5617d138f6684566b619405090989d55a2c /media-libs/gstreamer/files
parent586819755b4dbfdffdc8a725ab7c0f86095b8489 (diff)
gentoo resync : 21.09.2018
Diffstat (limited to 'media-libs/gstreamer/files')
-rw-r--r--media-libs/gstreamer/files/1.14.3-fix-gstsegment-test.patch46
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/media-libs/gstreamer/files/1.14.3-fix-gstsegment-test.patch b/media-libs/gstreamer/files/1.14.3-fix-gstsegment-test.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9b2fb2402e1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/media-libs/gstreamer/files/1.14.3-fix-gstsegment-test.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+From 0a479c3cdc5d5745b6cc5084d5faf3b0ab8e604a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jan Schmidt <jan@centricular.com>
+Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 22:13:22 +1000
+Subject: [PATCH] tests: Use a different rate in a segment test.
+
+Using a rate of 1.1 in the test is causing the test to
+fail on 32-bit because ceil(1.1 * 10) can round to 12.
+
+Instead use a rate 2.0 that can be expressed as floating
+point number and doesn't trigger the problem.
+
+https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=797154
+---
+ tests/check/gst/gstsegment.c | 6 +++---
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/tests/check/gst/gstsegment.c b/tests/check/gst/gstsegment.c
+index 17ad18c2f..751469d76 100644
+--- a/tests/check/gst/gstsegment.c
++++ b/tests/check/gst/gstsegment.c
+@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ GST_START_TEST (segment_full)
+ fail_unless_equals_int (pos, 190);
+
+ /* Test a non-1.0 rate that lands right before the segment, but still +ve */
+- segment.rate = 1.1;
++ segment.rate = 2.0;
+ segment.start = 100;
+ segment.offset = 0;
+ segment.stop = 500;
+@@ -897,11 +897,11 @@ GST_START_TEST (segment_full)
+ segment.time = 10000;
+ fail_unless (gst_segment_position_from_running_time_full (&segment,
+ GST_FORMAT_TIME, 140, &pos) == 1);
+- fail_unless (pos == 89);
++ fail_unless (pos == 80);
+ /* And now one that should give a position < 0 */
+ fail_unless (gst_segment_position_from_running_time_full (&segment,
+ GST_FORMAT_TIME, 0, &pos) == -1);
+- fail_unless (pos == 65);
++ fail_unless (pos == 200);
+
+ /* Test a non-1.0 negative rate that lands right after the (reversed) segment, but still +ve position */
+ segment.rate = -2.0;
+--
+2.17.0
+